<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/3.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>ConnPolitics - Latest comments on Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
		<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://connpolitics.tv/index.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=4300" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US-utf8</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=3.3.3"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Frustrated Taxpayer [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Frustrated Taxpayer [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32767@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>“This has nothing to do with approval ratings, this has to do with public perception, as approval ratings like any polling are inaccurate.”  Sorry Able, you lost me on this one.  I always thought there was a direct correlation between public perception and approval ratings.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[“This has nothing to do with approval ratings, this has to do with public perception, as approval ratings like any polling are inaccurate.”  Sorry Able, you lost me on this one.  I always thought there was a direct correlation between public perception and approval ratings.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32767</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Able [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Able [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32754@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>'The only thing ever 'correct' with any of your posts is the posting date - and that comes up automatically!'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're just adorable! But, in all fairness, that was quite a good comeback, and you deserve as many golden stars as your teacher can give.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'He is called The Messiah because he has fanatic followers that 'believe' in him. They have 'faith' regardless of any facts that may prove otherwise.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is exactly what I stated, which was true for George Bush in the frenzy post-9/11, wherein the majority of individuals put blind trust into him. There remains no difference on those basic facts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Christianity, Global Warming, Obama-ism. All religions. All have followers, all based on 'faith'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'I know which of the three I place my 'faith' in and the other two I laugh at and ridicule. Obama falls in the latter catagory.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is because you believe in men living in giant fish, selling daughters into slavery and wearing clothing only made without mixed threads. Whereas, I believe in science, not a giant game of telephone and certainly not Obama.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA['The only thing ever 'correct' with any of your posts is the posting date - and that comes up automatically!'<br />
<br />
You're just adorable! But, in all fairness, that was quite a good comeback, and you deserve as many golden stars as your teacher can give.<br />
<br />
'He is called The Messiah because he has fanatic followers that 'believe' in him. They have 'faith' regardless of any facts that may prove otherwise.'<br />
<br />
That is exactly what I stated, which was true for George Bush in the frenzy post-9/11, wherein the majority of individuals put blind trust into him. There remains no difference on those basic facts.<br />
<br />
'Christianity, Global Warming, Obama-ism. All religions. All have followers, all based on 'faith'.<br />
<br />
'I know which of the three I place my 'faith' in and the other two I laugh at and ridicule. Obama falls in the latter catagory.'<br />
<br />
That is because you believe in men living in giant fish, selling daughters into slavery and wearing clothing only made without mixed threads. Whereas, I believe in science, not a giant game of telephone and certainly not Obama.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32754</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>JoeSixPack [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JoeSixPack [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32752@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>Able, &lt;br /&gt;
The only thing ever 'correct' with any of your posts is the posting date - and that comes up automatically!&lt;br /&gt;
He is called The Messiah because he has fanatic followers that 'believe' in him.  They have 'faith' regardless of any facts that may prove otherwise.  &lt;br /&gt;
Christianity, Global Warming, Obama-ism.  All religions.  All have followers, all based on 'faith'.&lt;br /&gt;
I know which of the three I place my 'faith' in and the other two I laugh at and ridicule.  Obama falls in the latter catagory.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Able, <br />
The only thing ever 'correct' with any of your posts is the posting date - and that comes up automatically!<br />
He is called The Messiah because he has fanatic followers that 'believe' in him.  They have 'faith' regardless of any facts that may prove otherwise.  <br />
Christianity, Global Warming, Obama-ism.  All religions.  All have followers, all based on 'faith'.<br />
I know which of the three I place my 'faith' in and the other two I laugh at and ridicule.  Obama falls in the latter catagory.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32752</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Able [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Able [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32750@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>This has nothing to do with approval ratings, this has to do with public perception, as approval ratings like any polling are inaccurate. With public perception, it is viewed that individuals have the political might to pass any legislation, which is the basis of the Messiah nickname, therefore my analogy was correct.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This has nothing to do with approval ratings, this has to do with public perception, as approval ratings like any polling are inaccurate. With public perception, it is viewed that individuals have the political might to pass any legislation, which is the basis of the Messiah nickname, therefore my analogy was correct.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32750</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Frustrated Taxpayer [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Frustrated Taxpayer [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32745@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>Able, you forgot to point out that right after 9/11 Bush's approval rating was almost 90%.  I believe the current approval rating for Obama is 47%.  I'm not sure what you find comical, but I guess we all have our own quirky sense of humor.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Able, you forgot to point out that right after 9/11 Bush's approval rating was almost 90%.  I believe the current approval rating for Obama is 47%.  I'm not sure what you find comical, but I guess we all have our own quirky sense of humor.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32745</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Able [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Able [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32743@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>I find it comical how Obama is viewed as a Messiah, only in very derogatory comments, due to the fact that many like him.. yet Bush people fawned over and stated he could, 'do no wrong!' after 9/11. Oh how ye forget.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I find it comical how Obama is viewed as a Messiah, only in very derogatory comments, due to the fact that many like him.. yet Bush people fawned over and stated he could, 'do no wrong!' after 9/11. Oh how ye forget.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32743</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>JoeSixPack [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JoeSixPack [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32741@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>Critisism of The Messiah?  These writers are going to get a lump of coal in their stocking.  Since when did we start analyzing what The Chosen One says?  The important part is &quot;How&quot; he says it.  &lt;br /&gt;
This story is blasphemy and should be removed!&lt;br /&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Critisism of The Messiah?  These writers are going to get a lump of coal in their stocking.  Since when did we start analyzing what The Chosen One says?  The important part is "How" he says it.  <br />
This story is blasphemy and should be removed!<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32741</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>GLENNA MACDONALD [Visitor] in response to: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>GLENNA MACDONALD [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c32733@http://connpolitics.tv/</guid>
			<description>The fine print in the end will tell the tale when you show up at the doctors and they either show you the door or heal your ill`s.~Peace Glenna~</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The fine print in the end will tell the tale when you show up at the doctors and they either show you the door or heal your ill`s.~Peace Glenna~]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://connpolitics.tv/index.php/2009/12/08/obama-likes-both-sides-of-an-argument#c32733</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
