Comment from: George C [Visitor]
The bonuses are were negotiated in 2007 and are binding by contract. I think the AG is on the wrong side of the law on this issue.
02/03/10 @ 23:33
Comment from: Pat [Visitor]
Here we go, more free campaign advertising for the AG with the camera addiction.
02/04/10 @ 06:17
Comment from: Janie [Visitor]
The AG was invisible until he decided to further his quest for more power. As far as AIG - and the rest of the companies who profited from the bail-out my feeling is they should have been allowed to fail!!!
02/04/10 @ 07:18
Comment from: Todd [Visitor]
Janie - AIG was not invisible last year when he attempted to block their bonuses as well. I will agree that the AG is on the wrong side, and that these bonuses are part of their contract. However, a bonus is part of my contract as well, and since my company did not do well last year I did not get one.

AIG would have failed if it were not for the tax payers who bailed them out. Now its the tax payers giving these people bonuses. The employees at AIG are the poster children of corporate greed.

For once I agree with Janie, this company should have failed.
02/04/10 @ 08:05
Comment from: Get Real [Visitor]
I agree - the company should have failed, then these "employees" would not be getting any bonuses, but since Barak said that they were "Too big to fail" (translation: I or my friend own some of their stock) the company, along with its obligations survived.
02/04/10 @ 10:00
Comment from: Todd [Visitor]
GetReal,

AIG failed in 2008. According to the London times "US: Bush defends Fed's decision to bail out AIG." Obama did not bail them out.
02/04/10 @ 10:29
Comment from: Bill [Visitor]
Todd,
If you really have a contract as you state, which would be very unusual, it must have had a clause that allowed a non payment. Now tell the truth, do you really have a contract?
02/04/10 @ 11:00
Comment from: r schier [Visitor]
"The bonuses are were negotiated in 2007 and are binding by contract. I think the AG is on the wrong side of the law on this issue."

What's that to do with me. The B*st*rds should have been allowed to go bust, then we wouldn't be here discussing this. I couldn't give a rat's *ss about their BS "contracts"...
02/04/10 @ 12:10
Comment from: joe [Visitor]
Face it the Taxpayer got screwed again on this one. Bonuses these people should be looking at prosecution like the ENRON Executives.
02/04/10 @ 13:21
Comment from: phil [Visitor]
why do they keep talking about the bonuses being part of their contracts? we the taxpayers didnt sign those contracts so we arent responsible for them. as far as im concerned those contract are voided.
02/04/10 @ 14:12
Comment from: phil again [Visitor]
the taxpayers should demand that the contracts be made public.
02/04/10 @ 14:14
Comment from: Ordinary Citizen [Visitor]
Too bad the Democrat AG doesn't realize that his Democrat buddy Chris "dumba$$' Dodd, at Obama's direction, put language into the bill that was passed that protects AIG explicitly from having their bonuses stripped away from them by the Fed's.....

Another reason to vote for anything other than a Democrat at all levels this coming fall...

They just don't care !!!
02/04/10 @ 16:48
Comment from: sixpack [Visitor] Email
*----
Thank God for President Obama. He saved us all from a far worse depresion. I did not want to see Wall St. bailed out any more than the next guy, but it needed to happen. Thank God it did. Now, can we pay down the USA Debt for the next 20 years Please !!!!
02/04/10 @ 21:05

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Who is running ????Gov gives last State of State address »