Lieberman resists Medicare buy-in plan
By ConnPolitics.tv Editor on Dec 13, 2009 | In News, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I) | 45 feedbacks »
Washington (AP) – Republicans say you shouldn’t bet on a health care bill coming out of the Senate before Christmas.
Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell says Americans are “overwhelmingly opposed” to the bill. McConnell says it’s a stretch to think the Senate will ignore public opinion and “jam this through before Christmas.”
Independent Senator Joe Lieberman has threatened to join Republicans in opposing health care legislation if it permits uninsured individuals as young to 55 to purchase Medicare coverage.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid needs 60 votes to overcome Republican objections, and he’s been counting on support from Lieberman.
Democratic aides say Lieberman also has told Reid he would support a Republican-led filibuster if the bill lets the government sell insurance in competition with private companies.
45 comments
And what about all the damn FRAUD ????? Dead people recieving Medicare & Medicade payments....phony Dr's with PO boxes receiving Medicare & Medicade payments from medical information either stolen or bought.....the state of Florida has TONS of crap like that going on ..........
And people want the government to dictate how THIS bill is going to "help" us ????? LOL
Look at SSI.......people shouldnt have to get a damn attorney to get disability payments they DESERVE.......that will be next with ANYTHING RUN by the government....
This bill NEEDS to be defeated......all it does is spread already bloated costs around MORE.......
Washington Post - 2006:
"George W. Bush, retreating to familiar ground, has blamed the Clinton administration for North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. "
Interview on CNN June 23, 2000
GOV. GEORGE W.BUSH (R-TX), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: "There seems to be an effort out of Washington to blame me for rising energy prices. And the American people don't buy that. It's the -- Clinton-Gore administration's been there for seven years, we're more dependent now than ever before on energy from foreign sources. And I am amazed that they're trying to shift the blame away from the people that are holding the office."
Do you want more examples Janie.. I'd be happy to provide.
Don't ever criticize me for blaming the current situation on Bush again. And furthermore, Obama has the clean up the mess Bush and people like yourself created.
It is shameful that the supposedly richest and best country in the world cannot provide affordable healthcare to its WORKING people.
It is a RIGHT, not a luxury.
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. "
I don't see health-care listed as a 'right'...
Perhaps if they truly cared about doing their JOBS in Washington and actually legislated fixes to what is wrong with the healthcare system instead of just making everyone that is working pay for those who aren't, perhaps things would be better for all of us. That WOULD be covered under the '...promote the general welfare...' provision.
Big difference in the two words Promote and Provide... Obama's trying to re-write OUR Constitution and re-distibute the wealth of our country, no doubt about that.
Was it mentioned elsewhere in one of the Ammendments to the Constitution ? No it wasn't.. so therefore back to the difference between Provide and Promote....
If they had wanted the people in this Country to be the golden goose for those sitting around whining and crying with their hands out, then they would have said 'Provide for the general welfare'...
Proof, Alice? And Sean Hannity does not count...
Ordinary Citizen, Aside from South Africa, we are the only nation possessing a political system that does not believe health care is a right. If so, how do you define "general Welfare" I'm assuming this does not include the health of the nation?
Does that mean I can stop paying your social security and medicare? If so, THANK GOD!
"Big difference in the two words Promote and Provide... Obama's trying to re-write OUR Constitution and re-distibute the wealth of our country, no doubt about that."
Thats right, we can actually agree on something (the mere thoguht of it makes me sick). We can agree that he wants to redistribute the wealth of the nation in the same way Bush did. Rather than giving the majority of the income to the top 1%, he wants others to have the opportunity and right to access it. And since I work my a$$ off and pay more of a percentage of my taxable income than Bill Gates, I have no problem with a redistribution.
The fact is this. When, in the early 21st century the tax codes were rewritten by congress to benefit the wealthy you didn't complain. Now that congress is attempting to rewrite them to benefit the middle class and pore i.e. the majority, you scream your gut out.
By the way you are not paying for my social security and medicare, I am !!!
LOL
"Dump Dodd"
You have no 'right' to take the goods or services of another without offering something of equal value in return.
We stopped that in April of 1865.
You want healthcare, pay for it. I am so sick of people thinking the government owe them anything. It doesn't!
Hey Bill, Todd and Able will post some radically communist stuff we know no decent American would ever write, so i think they just do it for fun.
How is that being shallow? Also, you're co-opting my answer, in hopes of tailoring it your needs. The general welfare includes social programs, show me how it doesn't.
'Hey Bill, Todd and Able will post some radically communist stuff we know no decent American would ever write, so i think they just do it for fun.'
You're not sure what Communism is, are you? Because, I am not a Communist, nor do I post quotes from Marx. Also, please define what a 'decent American' is. Are 'decent Americans' the ones who stole land from the Indigenous populations? The ones who waged wars for natural resources? The ones who deny the rights to their citizens based on their race, color or sexual identity?
If so. Call me a poor excuse for an American, but an excellent human being.
you're a poor excuse for a lot of things and an excellent nothing......
"The White House is encouraging Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to cut a deal with Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), which would mean eliminating the proposed Medicare expansion in the health reform bill, according to an official close to the negotiations."
All presidents want to control Congress, but this is ridiculous and very disconcerting if Congress actually allow it. The Constitution up to be separation of power-- not a rubber stamp.
I visited the Marx museum of communism in Trier Germany and after spending a lot of time evaluating the teachings of Marxism I can assure anyone that left wingers follow the Communist doctrine of big government. For some reason the left wingers don''t like to be called Communists-- but the accept "liberal". Maybe its because they don't want to reveal their selves as such. Milton Friedman was as self described liberal and I hardly think left wingers follow his Capitalistic teachings.
Patriot Act, War in Iraq, War on Terror, TARP. You were alright when congress rubber stamped everything Bush wanted, now you have problems with it and criticize them for doing the same with Obama. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
"Hey Bill, Todd and Able will post some radically communist stuff we know no decent American would ever write, so i think they just do it for fun."
If you're a "decent American" then I'm leaving the country. Are you a nasty bigot just for fun? I would hope so, because if you are as nasty and angry as you seem you will mostly likely be a very sad person.
"you're a poor excuse for a lot of things and an excellent nothing......"
Do you have anything constructive to contribute? Just remember that it was your generation that screwed us up. And remember me when you get your social security check, as you are living off my income... socialist.
"Able says he not a Communist... While most of his posts support the left wing philosophy."
Thats because all on the left are Communists? I don't really believe that to be so. It's like me saying that all on the right are self-absorbed capitalist, gun slinging pigs. It just doesn't make sense. However, many in this thread who are on the right are unable to see the gray in any argument. Rather you are this or that, black or white, and there is nothing between.
James Madison, Federalist No. 58, 1788
Did James see Obama in the future?
As always, they think that only they have the right to speak their opinions... the rest of us here aren't allowed to unless it follows the kool-aid mantra...
Interesting. I'd like to see where this is said, by anyone. On the other hand, I don't care if you're here, you entertain me.
'you're a poor excuse for a lot of things and an excellent nothing...... '
Well, at least I'm excellent at being nothing. Gold stars all around!
'Able says he not a Communist... While most of his posts support the left wing philosophy.'
All of my posts represent a leftist philosophy, not most. Secondly, by your logic Communism is the ONLY ideology on the left. So, we can conclude that you have no understanding of the political spectrum and should not be regarded as an expert in these matters.
'I can assure anyone that left wingers follow the Communist doctrine of big government.'
I follow the doctrine of no government.
'For some reason the left wingers don''t like to be called Communists-- but the accept "liberal".'
If I were a Communist then I wouldn't care being called one, but as I'm not, it is confusing. Also, I don't mind the term 'liberal,' but do the term 'Liberal.' As one can define the whole left, and the other defines a Democrat who just wants to fix problems with checks.
'Maybe its because they don't want to reveal their selves as such.'
I have no problem admitting what ideology I am once individuals on this blog are able to deduce what it is. If one understood the various philosophies than it would become a simple venture.
'Milton Friedman was as self described liberal and I hardly think left wingers follow his Capitalistic teachings.'
He was about as liberal as Reagen.
I have to admit that your belief "I follow the doctrine of no government." is truly funny.... you espouse all this existentialism crap such as that all the time....
If your world were to be turned upside down by some natural catastrophe, you'd be the first one yelling and screaming, demanding that the Government take care of you...
You'll be whimpering in the corner when bands of lawless thugs decide that they want to take what you have for themselves...
I'm sure you wouldn't last a day without modern items like electricity and running water...
So please shut up with the "I believe in no government" garbage... it sounds nice and may impress the little boys and girls in the coffee bar or whatever other cafe you hangout in, but it truly is an asinine comment...
You base this on what assumption? Where are any quotes, facts, data and analysis to back up this realization? You have none, therefore your attempt at a logical ending to your assumption is all for naught.
'You'll be whimpering in the corner when bands of lawless thugs decide that they want to take what you have for themselves...'
The second component of your assumption is that humanity will be DEVOID of humanity, or community or willingness to protect itself. One need not maintain a government to do participate within those actions.
'I'm sure you wouldn't last a day without modern items like electricity and running water...'
My water comes from the rain filtration and containment system currently, so tell me again how this would be a problem? Secondly, my power comes from various renewable resources that are fed back into the grid, and can subsist by themselves without a centralized facility. So, thanks for trying, I love the effort, but you've failed again.
'So please shut up with the "I believe in no government" garbage... it sounds nice and may impress the little boys and girls in the coffee bar or whatever other cafe you hangout in, but it truly is an asinine comment...'
I don't drink coffee. The only asinine comments come from those who believe government, capitalism and lack of education are the ways to set humanity free. So, while you attempt to belittle me because you fear what you do not know, I will take that internal hatred you have and still make attempts to make the world better for you.
Let's not forget he not the only democrat that won't vote for it. You see some of them want to get re-elected. The 2010 election will be bad news for them.
Plain and simple, all I was trying to say is that your "I follow the doctrine of no government " is truly a crock of BS...
Society as a whole operates on the basis of laws and governance. For you to say that you believe in no government is to say that you also don't believe in society. Yet you profess to be all for a better society... Two opposing ideas.
I'm truly glad that you have the environmentally sensible rain water collection (just curious though... how does it compensate for a drought or other dry spell?) and renewable energy sources as well.
My point was more to the fact that, like I said, when you are faced with lawless thugs who could care less for society find out you have this wonderful little oasis of creature comfort and decide to take it from you, who are you going to turn to? I assume you're anti-gun and wouldn't keep one in your house, much less know how to safely and effectively use it.
As for the "" So please shut up with the "I believe in no government" garbage... it sounds nice and may impress the little boys and girls in the coffee bar or whatever other cafe you hangout in, but it truly is an asinine comment...""
It really is an asinine thing to say and will only impress the high school kiddies or college kids.
It doesn't wash with anyone who is mature and has a grip on reality.
Whether or not you drink coffee is a moot point.
Yet, I just proved to you it isn't. While you may be scared of living in a world where a government is non-existent, I am not.
'I assume you're anti-gun and wouldn't keep one in your house, much less know how to safely and effectively use it.'
I am anti-gun, but do know how to use one, and have fired one on countless occasions. So, there you go attempting to create misconceptions with your narrow world view.
'how does it compensate for a drought or other dry spell?'
One must compensate in the same manner any other individual does throughout the world when it is threatened either by privatization or natural catastrophe. You improvise. That being said, I do have pipes with 'city water' running to my home, for they were there when I purchased the home. It is not my goal to absolve myself from issues, for it is impossible to, merely to lessen certain impacts.
'It doesn't wash with anyone who is mature and has a grip on reality.'
Other than the millions of professionals, lawyers, doctors, athletes, farm workers, social workers, non-profit works, school teachers, union and non-union workers and others who already support it.
'Whether or not you drink coffee is a moot point.'
It was sarcasm, and sorry that you're unable to address that.
'For you to say that you believe in no government is to say that you also don't believe in society. Yet you profess to be all for a better society... Two opposing ideas.'
I shall address the separate points. Firstly, I do not believe in government as a general philosophy, but am a realist and do understand that a government exists, therefore it should be to the benefit of those citizens that dwell within its reaches. One must work within the system they are given, and change it from within, therefore that is what I, and the countless millions whom support a similar thought process also do.
Now, a society can exist with a fragmented rule of law, and without a governance, in the sense of a centralized operating body. One should look into the Tsimihety and study their culture, societal structure and realize that while their is no government, they still exist in large numbers.
I said you are free to leave the country and that I would buy your ticket. Second, that paranoid assertion of "concentration camps" comes from Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. If you are dumb enough to believe it go right ahead.
"But Todd has been the thorn in a lot of people's backside especially mine for a while now."
Probably because I don't agree with you...
"I find it humorous that liberals feel free to make snide and condescending comments here."
Yes, because your profanity and threat laced comments are not snide, abusive or condescending. Maybe you should look up those words, as you apparently don't know how they are used OR you are so out of touch with your own psyche that you cannot see the behaviors you criticize in others in yourself.
But, as in the past, I am done addressing you.
Leave a comment
| « Obama pushing banking execs | Questions, answers on Wall Street bill » |