Comment from: GLENNA MACDONALD [Visitor] Email
Count my vote for Ralph Nader!
~Peace Glenna~
11/17/09 @ 22:40
Comment from: Independant Observer [Visitor] Email
After I read Nader's book "unsafe at any speed" I decided he is a crack pot guided by blind emotion and not engineer principles. His notoriety came after the book, but no one challenged his assertions which later were debunked. Now he is on this green kick because it is popular and again his assertions are not grounded in realistic solutions. Emotion and popularism is his forte.
11/17/09 @ 23:04
Comment from: Len Roberts [Visitor] Email · http://dumpchrisdodd.com
**---
Not a good idea to have 3 candiates that splits the people who want to Dump Dodd, we need just need two candiates. one on one. that is unless Dodd moves back to Iowa ??


"Dump Dodd"
11/18/09 @ 07:53
Comment from: Get Real [Visitor] Email
Linda 2010.
11/18/09 @ 10:37
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
'Not a good idea to have 3 candiates that splits the people who want to Dump Dodd, we need just need two candiates. one on one. that is unless Dodd moves back to Iowa ??'

So, you want limited options because you're afraid of people having a choice? How very statist of you!

'After I read Nader's book "unsafe at any speed" I decided he is a crack pot guided by blind emotion and not engineer principles.'

I see. Yet it contains actual data, and it helped create better safety regulations for the auto industry? Ah. THAT crackpot.

'His notoriety came after the book, but no one challenged his assertions which later were debunked.'

The U.S. Auto Industry challenged him, and failed when they later came out and apologized for attempting to ruin his life.

'Now he is on this green kick because it is popular and again his assertions are not grounded in realistic solutions. Emotion and popularism is his fort'

He was actually the Green Party's candidate in 1996 and 2000. Also, if you mean 'green' as in environmental slang context, he was behind much of the movement in the 1960-1970's. He is a populist, that is not in doubt, but to say he lacks experience, intelligence or any merits for the job is to be truly blind.

Nader in 2010.
11/18/09 @ 10:46
Comment from: generation x [Visitor] Email
All the way Linda McMahon!!!!!!!!!
11/18/09 @ 12:10
Comment from: clayton moore [Visitor]
I guess now we troll the nation looking for someone to run for office. Why don't we post a want ad on Facebook?
11/18/09 @ 12:38
Comment from: Dominik [Visitor]
*****
Your getting my vote Nader!
11/18/09 @ 13:43
Comment from: Steve [Visitor] Email · http://www.paratrooper.net
Nader would be an improvement over Dodd no doubt... heck... one of our Siamese cats would be an improvement over that self serving twit.
11/18/09 @ 15:35
Comment from: anonymous [Visitor]
Good maybe he will siphon of votes from Dodd and we will get a Republican US Senator and get rid of Duddley Do Nothing.
11/21/09 @ 16:55
Comment from: anonymous [Visitor]
The Green Party can run Osama Bin Laden, Ken Krayeske, Ralph Nader or Ned Lamont It really does not matter. They have no chance of winning as they are just another liberal faction that just does not want to be known as Democrats. They are basically a vote to throw away plain and simple.
11/26/09 @ 06:38

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Bethel Rep faces motor vehicle chargesGOP chair wants candidate to switch races »