Comment from: Get Real [Visitor] Email
The problem with electric cars is how is he electricity going to be produced?????
If it's not nuclear then there is going to be some resources needed elsewhere..... fossil fuels burnt elsewhere, land taken for hydro dams or land taken for "solar farms"......
Let's think ahead before we start leaping or going near the leading edge - which is also known as the bleeding edge!
11/15/09 @ 18:06
Comment from: drjohn [Visitor] Email
Exactly. Democrats think electricity comes from a wall socket.
11/15/09 @ 18:08
Comment from: Visitor2 [Visitor] Email
Not only power issues, but cars like the Toyota Prius use non-recycleable NiMH batteries which are toxic to the environment and need to go into a special landfill.

All the greenies out there with there Prius' are creating bigger problems than we already have.......
11/15/09 @ 18:56
Comment from: Steve [Visitor] Email · http://www.paratrooper.net
How's about a return to mass transit for an answer? Light rail commuter trains and all that hmm? Seemed to work pretty well where I was stationed in Germany and in American cities like Portland, OR.

Oh... that's right... here in CT we tore up all the old track where train and trolley lines used to run. Guess judicious use of imminent domain could solve that but boy there would be a backlash.
11/15/09 @ 19:50
Comment from: Sarah [Visitor] Email
I would like to see some real engineering data on this. Politicians are not to be trusted.
How much does the electric car cost as compared to a natural gas powered car. compare the cost electric vs natural gas power for a 3000 lb car in the city and highway in an honest manner.
The reports that I have seen so far in the media leave a lot to be desired and are never technically accurate.
11/15/09 @ 20:37
Comment from: Hosed By The System [Visitor] Email
Before this state gets WAY to far ahead of anything with these costly study's......lets see where this technology is actually going to take us....

Personally, I believe going the "plug in" route isnt going to be the way to go...BUT...having a fuel cell powered by cold fusion or hydrogen to produce electricity to power the car IS....

"battery" powered cars are efficient OR cost effective in the long run...........
11/16/09 @ 07:19
Comment from: Hosed By The System [Visitor] Email
should read: " ARENT efficient or cost effective"...

sorry....
11/16/09 @ 07:20
Comment from: JoeSixPack [Visitor] Email
Fantastic news. This means we are finally going to start building some more electric generation plants in the state. More nukes, more coal, more oil more hydro....it's about time. Build plants, string wires and I'll power my dog with electricity if they make it cheap enough!
If they plan to raise my rates 3-4 times to pay for wind/solar they can stick it in their ear. I'll keep my gasoline -thank you very much.
11/16/09 @ 08:09
Comment from: Konrad Kwiatkowski [Visitor] Email · http://www.isuglobal.com
*****
Hello;

I would like to take a moment to write a summary of my patent. It's a national solar grid concept, which utilizes our existing infrastructure i.e., the trucking industry and the U.S. highway system, for generation, storage and management of energy, to supplement the national grid.

I would like to give you some numbers to illustrate the impact trucking industry has on the economy and the evironment.

- Nearly 80% of U.S. communities receive their goods by a truck.

- Trucking moves nearly 70% of all freight tonnage in U.S.

- Presently ther are nearly 2 million tractor-trailers registered in U.S., generating combined revenue of over $650 billion.

- Trucking consumes 54 billion gallons of diesel and gasoline per year, and as fuel prices have risen and remained high, profit margins have sharply decreased.

- Truck idling amounts to 1 billion gallons of fuel burned, without advancing the cargo towards its destination.

- Single long haul truck has to take 10 hours off after driving for 11 hours. At 1 gallon of fuel per hour spent idling, that translates to 10 gallons of fuel wasted per day.

- Truck idling emits an estimated 11 million tons of CO2, 18,000 tons of NOx, and 5,000 tons of particulate matter annually.

In view of these circumstances, there is a pressing need to reduce fuel consumption, offset rising fuel costs, and reduce the carbon foot print of each truck on the road, and the carbon foot print of the nation as a whole.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a mobile electricity distribution network that can accumulate, store and distribute electricity into existing power grid, in turn lowering the necessity of power plants to burn fossil fuels. Some of the "by products" of the invention are lowering of the fuel costs by eliminating idling which in turn will drive down the cost of the goods delivered, while reducing the carbon foot print of the trucking industry. This system could power up some of the charging stations for electric vehicles. Also, there is a pressing need to update the inefficient, and antiquated power grid, which will become prone to blackouts, as well as the possibility homeland security issues. By implementig this idea we will be able to create a backup power distribution network, which in the time of need will be at the least a back up system for emergency systems.

The aim of my invention is to lease the roof space of the trailers and install solar panels on them which will be tied to a battery and inverter module, which will be built into the chassis of the trailer. The stored energy will transfer to the power grid where ever the truck stops, for rest, refueling or back at the hub of operation. There the stored trailers will continue to produce power which can be used to power up the facilities or be sold back to the power grid. All of the onboard electric need will be supplied by the battery bank and eliminate idling. Back at the storage facilities the unused trailers will be able to interconnect and become a major power producing plant. This translates into trains and container shipping.

By utilizing thin film PV technology, we will be able to keep the weight down, and with the advancements in battery efficiency, I believe that innovation will catch up to the implementation of this solar grid backup.

This system will create many jobs which at the current state of economy is a very welcome sight. The power discharge stations will be manned by certifed electricians, the racking of the panels and discharge stations will employ many people. There is a very limited impact on the infrastructure as well as landscape, which many are concerned about. It takes care of the space allocation problems as well as the aestetic infrastructure required for installation of solar arrays.

Thank you for your time,

Konrad Kwiatkowski

Managing Partner

Interstate Solar Utilities, LLC

11 Main Street

Old Mystic, CT 06355

Office 860-572-0089

Fax 860-572-0084
11/16/09 @ 09:39
Comment from: GLENNA MACDONALD [Visitor] Email
Have solar charge the electric that charges the electric cars,or make the cars solar at least 50%.
Until a solar panel is inventet that can power a car soly on solar.Depending on the power grid is not a good idea.We need to get away from the grid and go solar.

~Peace Glenna~
11/16/09 @ 11:50
Comment from: Winnebago Warrior [Visitor] Email
To move an object such as a vehicle using a plug-in charging system or directly fueling the vehicle with fossil fuel the electric plug-in system will be less efficient than a direct fueled system unless the electric system is powered from a non-fossil fueled source such as nuclear, solar, wind, etc.
11/16/09 @ 15:59
Comment from: Independant Observer [Visitor] Email
Konrad your assumptions are not verifiable-- and is some cases unrealistic. Back to the drawing board after you prove and verify the assumptions.
11/16/09 @ 16:29
Comment from: h3d [Visitor] Email
GM has announced it is moving alot slower in the production of electric /hybrid cars. Their main focus right now is 4 cylinder cars.
11/16/09 @ 19:39
Comment from: Canada Guy [Visitor] · http://www.selfdestructivebastards.com/
Electric cars are useful in small doses, and can be beneficial for the environment. However, they cannot, and should not, be used to replace cars on the mass scale. We need more efficient long distance transportation systems for cargo and passengers, such as electrified rail.

http://www.selfdestructivebastards.com/2009/10/electric-cars-in-small-doses.html
11/17/09 @ 10:13
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
I'll agree with Steve on this one. Improve public transportation, even though electric cars would be beneficial for state vehicles.
11/17/09 @ 11:14

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Obama: Uncensored society is healthyMedical errors hidden after law changed »