Obama outlines education plan
By ConnPolitics.tv Editor on Mar 10, 2009 | In News | 5 feedbacks »
Washington (AP) – President Barack Obama embraced merit pay for teachers Tuesday in spelling out a vision of education that will almost certainly alienate union backers.
A strategy that ties teacher pay to student performance has for years been anathema to teachers’ unions, a powerful force in the Democratic Party. These unions also are wary of charter schools, nontraditional educational systems that they believe compete with traditional schools for tax dollars.
Obama, however, also spoke favorably of charter schools, saying that where they work, they should be encouraged.
He did acknowledge in his speech to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce that his proposals could meet heavy resistance in both political parties.
“Too many supporters of my party have resisted the idea of rewarding excellence in teaching with extra pay, even though we know it can make a difference in the classroom,” he said, delivering the first major education speech of his presidency. “Too many in the Republican Party have opposed new investments in early education, despite compelling evidence of its importance.”
But he argued that a far-reaching overhaul of the nation’s education system is an economic imperative that can’t wait, despite the urgency of the financial crisis and other pressing issues.
“Despite resources that are unmatched anywhere in the world, we have let our grades slip, our schools crumble, our teacher quality fall short, and other nations outpace us,” Obama said. “The relative decline of American education is untenable for our economy, unsustainable for our democracy, and unacceptable for our children. We cannot afford to let it continue. What is at stake is nothing less than the American dream.”
Randi Weingarten, president of the 1.4 million-member American Federation of Teachers, said the union would “embrace the goals and aspirations outlined today by President Obama.”
“Teachers want to make a difference in kids’ lives, and they appreciate a president who shares that goal and will spend his political capital to provide the resources to make it happen,” she said. “As with any public policy, the devil is in the details, and it is important that teachers’ voices are heard.”
The ideas the president promoted were nearly all elements of his campaign platform last year. He only barely mentioned the reauthorization of the Bush-era No Child Left Behind Act, which introduced sweeping reforms that schools are struggling to meet without the funding to match. Obama said his administration would “later this year” ensure that schools get the funding they need and that the money is conditioned on results.
Among the principles Obama laid out were:
–Challenging states to adopt world-class standards rather than a specific standard. Obama’s economic stimulus plan includes a $5 billion incentive fund to reward states for, among other things, boosting the quality of standards and state tests, and the president said the Education Department would create a fund to invest in innovation.
–Improved pre-kindergarten programs, including $5 billion in the stimulus plan to grow Head Start, expand child care access and do more for children with special needs. He also said he would offer 55,000 first-time parents regular visits from trained nurses and said that states that develop cutting-edge plans to raise the quality of early learning programs would get an Early Learning Challenge Grant, if Congress approves the new program.
–Reducing student dropout rates. To students, Obama said: “Don’t even think about dropping out of school.” But he said that reducing the dropout rates also requires turning around the worst schools, something he asked lawmakers, parents and teachers to make “our collective responsibility as Americans.”
–Repeating his call for everyone to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training, with the goal of highest proportion of college graduates in the world by the year 2020.
On charter schools, he said the caps instituted by some states on how many are allowed aren’t “good for our children, our economy, or our country.”
Obama also spoke at length about what he described his policy toward teachers, what he called an `unprecedented commitment to ensure that anyone entrusted with educating our children is doing the job as well as it can be done.” In up to 150 more school districts, Obama said, teachers will get mentoring, more money for improved student achievement and new responsibilities.Also, Obama said, “We need to make sure our students have the teacher they need to be successful. That means states and school districts taking steps to move bad teachers out of the classroom. Let me be clear: if a teacher is given a chance but still does not improve, there is no excuse for that person to continue teaching.”
The president acknowledged that a rethinking of the traditional American school day may not be welcome – “not in my family, and probably not in yours” – but is critical.
“The challenges of a new century demand more time in the classroom,” Obama said. “If they can do that in South Korea, we can do it right here in the United States of America.”
After the speech, Obama stopped at a hotel to drop in on another meeting, an already scheduled and ongoing round-table discussion between Education Secretary Arne Duncan and the Council of Chief State School Officers, which involves the heads of education from every state and U.S. territory.
5 comments
Bad teachers - get rid of them. Merit pay - reminds me of CEO bonuses. This doesn't bode well for our school systems. Sounds like more testing and less teaching will be our children's future. As for charter schools - make them take the same tests as the public schools and then MAYBE I would consider sending my child to one.
I, who have supported Obama on many things, believe he is missing the mark on this one!
Less testing = More teaching
Parent accountability is a missing piece of the puzzle. Sending our children to school for a longer day becasue children in South Korea go to school a longer day - why don't we just send the children away to boarding school and get it over with!
You know what they say...those who can-do and those who can't-teach!
That being said, parents also have to be accountable for their chidren. Why should we spend millions of dollars on pre-K. Having children is a responsibility and having them prepared for Kindergarten is part of it. Every parent with a high school diploma is capable of prepaing their child for Kindergarten. It just takes time - get off the sofa and get busy. I have three children and my husband and I spend a lot of time helping them with homework & projects. Do I always feel like it - Heck, No but I know it's vital for their success.
Heck, even McDonald's doesn't pay based on merit!
As for your tax dollars going for 'THEIR' pensions - teachers contribute from their pay and don't get Social Security.
Parents need to parent and we need to stop expecting the school to fix the kids. Public schools take every child - disruptive, disabled, gifted, or not. Charter schools and private schools can be choosey.
Are there bad teachers - yes but it isn't the majority. This nation teaches to a test. We no longer want children to be educated, we want to produce workers. We have shifted our dogma in this society away from educating children to a Marxism based approach. Educate to support the ecomony as it exists instead of expanding the knowledge and therefore the economy by expanding what we are capable of.
Our system is made to educate students to a point, that point being the ability to use machinery or work in a factory. Nothing more. We create robots.
Leave a comment
| « Poll: Dodd tied with Simmons | Did the state trap the trappers? » |