Comment from: lisa [Visitor] Email
Lawrence Summers along with Phil Gramn are directly responsible for the deregulation that has caused this economic meltdown. Now he will be the Director of National Economic Council?!!That is definitely not the change we need!!!
11/24/08 @ 13:18
Comment from: Robin Hood [Visitor] Email
Phil Gramm, GW, Cheney, Enron, Wendy Gramm, is who I think you mean.
11/24/08 @ 13:36
Comment from: Robin Hood [Visitor] Email
I do agree that Lawrence Summers is a bad choice.

he has quite a load of baggage, he had issues while at Harvard and World Bank and seems to have foot in mouth disease

In doing research on him I find he was a proponent of Free Trade and of moving polluting manufacturing out of the US

but I see no link between him and the evil ones listed above as far as deregulation is concerned
11/24/08 @ 13:46
Comment from: Succeeded In tThe System [Visitor] Email
What is most disconcerting is that the Obama economic team is the Clinton team. If we look at who is getting bailed out in the banking industry we will see that most of the senior board members have strong ties with the Clinton's. The bailout is also being forced onto banks that don't need the government help along with CITI group. Is this entire situation trying to obscure the fact the bailout is for CITI group only and the inclusion of other banks are diversion of the that?
It is looking like we voted in the Clinton's to office with Obama as a puppet.
Where is our media research and investigative journalism on these matters. Or has the media
simply been bought off with ideology and money to where they are to corrupt to provide objective journalism.
11/24/08 @ 16:14
Comment from: Janie [Visitor] Email
I am going to sit back - more or less - and give Obama a chance. However, his entire hand picked administration proved to me that he does not have a clue by himself to handle the presidency. Some of us knew that right from the start.
11/24/08 @ 16:48
Comment from: r schier [Visitor] Email
"What is most disconcerting is that the Obama economic team is the Clinton team. If we look at who is getting bailed out in the banking industry we will see that most of the senior board members have strong ties with the Clinton's. The bailout is also being forced onto banks that don't need the government help along with CITI group. Is this entire situation trying to obscure the fact the bailout is for CITI group only and the inclusion of other banks are diversion of the that?"

I think you're a little confused: the current bailouts taking place are
being driven by Paulson, and
not by the upcoming team. Bush has particularly - and emphatically - favored the Citigroup deal. I will wait and see with Obama...If deficit spending is to continue - and Obama is of his word - it will certainly be far
better spent for the public infrastuctures that are begging for maintenance and improvements, as opposed to directing further dollars to the paper trading non-value adding economy, so these thieves can add to their inventory of mansions that they live in 2 days out of the year.....Long story short, we need our economic resources to be directed to shoring up our country...not further enriching those who add absolutely no tangible value...
We may as well have another run on Tulips at the rate we were going...
11/25/08 @ 09:48
Comment from: lisa [Visitor] Email
I indeed read that Larry Summers (Democrat) along with Republican Phil Gramm were directly responsible for the deregulation of the glass Steagel act under the Clinton Adminstration. I don't mind if Obama wants to use Clinton's people (although it goes against his whole primary campaign of change) but lets put the Clinton people in who helped the country not the ones who brought it to its knees.
11/25/08 @ 12:51
Comment from: Sam [Visitor] Email
I just hope that if Obama decides to bailout the Auto Industry he insists that the whole organization be revamped. If not, they will blow through that $25 billion in a matter of months. After all they just gave them $20 billion a few months ago.

Those union contracts with the legacy costs must be dissolved or they will never make it. But with all of the money the Democrats get from the unions, will they really be able to make the right decisions?????
11/25/08 @ 12:57
Comment from: anonymous [Visitor]
Although i voted for McCain. I think Obama needs to have a chance to try and get things going. This is an 8 year problem he is inheriting I think If Gore or Kerry had been President and not Dubya. We would be living a lot better now. Obama needs to be given time to try to fix this.Only time will tell.
11/25/08 @ 18:30

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Conn. lawmakers tackling budget deficitBush says Citigroup deal needed to protect system »