Comment from: Neal [Visitor] Email
Obama is clueless and closely coupled to the extreme left wingers.
06/21/08 @ 18:44
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
How is caring about the planet, and using logic pandering to left wingers? It's pandering to those with a brain and a heart.
06/21/08 @ 22:14
Comment from: More Liberal Bulls**T [Visitor]
Obama doesnt care because im sure like every politician in Washington DC im sure he is pandering to Big OIL and WALMART
06/21/08 @ 22:59
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
I'm not doubting that he may be, but that isn't the point that Neal made.

I don't want anyone to pander to oil or Wal Mart, both are horrible 'corporations.'
06/22/08 @ 00:05
Comment from: jeff [Visitor] Email
ok, so there is a 'stop gap' supply of oil off the coast of the best beaches in north America... but America has to admit they/we are "oil-holics" and i don't see the major oil corporations DOING A N Y T H I N G new and progressive to change the old ways...(well, infrront of impotent congressmen they say they are...and their propaganda tv comercials say they are, ha!)

i say let it hurt, develop alternatives/progressive fuels(you capitalists hate that word 'progressive', don't you)and what oil, and the new oil off my beach, we have left over, transition and tax it with it...like Europe, (high taxes are negative re-enforcement) to using fossil fuels...

and when they pass the bill to drill off the coast, include a criminal act for the CEOs, CFO, COOs and the board, taking all their property, consider them a 'domestic enemy', and send them to GITMO!!! no arrainment hearing either...
06/22/08 @ 10:18
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
Sounds like an excellent plan.
06/22/08 @ 12:52
Comment from: Neal [Visitor] Email
Being realistic with a plan that builds our economy is the way. Obama's plan is pandering to the left with platitudes and wishful thinking. Technology has developed for oil and nuclear to be environmentally worth while. Those energy source would sustain us until alternative energy sources could be developed into viable sources.
Obama wants the tax and spend model that would destroy our way of life while adopting Socialism. I guess he believes that energy is not required to run a country like ours.
06/22/08 @ 16:08
Comment from: Neal [Visitor] Email
Russian oil and North Sea oil is experiencing stagnation while the Saudis will increase its capacity to 12.5 mbl from the present 9 mbl. The Saudi increase would happen next year and is expected to bring oil down to $$100/bl.
I suppose the Obama crowd think the increase from Saudi would be more acceptable than allow our drilling. Unfortunately, we would still have rely on unfriendly nations and our national security will remain compromised--- which is rather stupid.
The speculators have driven up the price of oil while the Obama crowd thinks they can control them. The sad truth is the speculators are off shore and out of reach from the Obama crowd.
Meanwhile politicians keep playing the stupid blame game while the media is doing nothing help the nation understand the issue and problems.
It is gross malfeasance of our Government to allow this present situation while having no clue as to what to do. There is absolutely no reason for Congress to go on vacation while we have this problem. They should be demanded to stay in session to address the energy problems this country faces.
Where is the outrage from the media to keep Congress in session-----------------?
06/22/08 @ 16:21
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
'Technology has developed for oil and nuclear to be environmentally worth while.'

Nuclear and oil are not 'worth while' for the planet or our health. There are no disposal methods for nuclear waste other than to bury them in places such as Yucca Mountain.

1. Nuclear energy could sustain its present minor contribution of some 21/2 percent of global final energy demand for about 75 years, but only by postponing indefinitely the expenditure of energy that would be needed to deal with its waste.

2. Each stage in the nuclear life-cycle, other than fission itself, produces carbon dioxide.

3. The depletion of uranium becomes apparent when nuclear power is considered as a major source of energy. For instance, if required to provide all the electricity used worldwide -- while clearing up the new waste it produced -- it could (notionally) do so for about six years before it ran out of usable rich uranium ore.

4. World uranium reserves are: Reasonable Assured Reserves recoverable at less than $US130/kgU (or $US50/lb U3O8) = 3.10 - 3.28 million tons.

Energy is required to run a country, but so is logical thinking and ingenuity. Nearly continuing the destruction of the planet with a nonrenewable, ever fleeting resource lacks both.

I do agree that we should be energy independent, as I believe all nations should. But depending on oil, spending billions of dollars on nuclear, oil, gas and coal technology to only further worsen the problem of global warming, all while waiting for minuscule results is preposterous.

I agree that Congress is at fault, but we cannot deny our failure to commit to fixing the problem either. Consuming less fuel while demanding alternatives that can be implemented is a logical way. It is not 'Socialism' as many would like to say, it is conservation and compassion.

Also, viable sources exist today and just need to be thoroughly funded as oil is. Solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, etc. are all viable and ready to be implemented in mass use.
06/22/08 @ 17:08
Comment from: CTRedSoxFan [Visitor] Email
67% of the American public wants offshore drilling, as reported in the 6/17 Rasmussen poll.

It's the left wing environmentalist nut jobs that oppose it and the very radical barak Hussein Obama is pandering to them.

We need offshore drilling as well as alternatives. WE aren't going to run our cars by doing nothing as barak wants. Unless maybe he can enlist David Copperfield to concoct some magic potion?
06/23/08 @ 07:16
Comment from: Able [Visitor] Email
Those 67% are being fed lies about what will bring prices down, and drilling for oil in ANWAR or off the coasts will do no such thing. Plain and simple. Get the facts.
06/23/08 @ 18:16

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Hagel says he'd consider VP offer from ObamaMcCain criticizes Obama's opposition to NAFTA »