Obama criticizes McCain on offshore drilling
By ConnPolitics.tv Editor on Jun 20, 2008 | In News, Vote 2008, Barack Obama | 11 feedbacks »
Jacksonville, Fla. (AP) – Barack Obama on Friday dismissed rival John McCain’s proposal to allow offshore drilling as an election-year conversion, arguing that it will not lower gas prices for families “this year, next year, five years from now.”
The likely Democratic nominee pledged to keep in place the federal government’s 27-year moratorium on offshore drilling, and criticized McCain on changing his position on the matter.
Said Obama: “The politics may have changed but the facts haven’t.”
In McCain’s 2000 campaign, the Republican said he favored the moratorium. This week, he said he supports lifting it to give states the option to drill, and cited as a reason alleviating the pressure on consumers facing high gas prices.
But Obama asserted that opening up the U.S. coastline to oil exploration would not give Americans any short-term appreciable savings.
“John McCain’s proposal, George Bush’s proposal, to drill offshore here in Florida and other places would not provide families any relief this year, next year, five years from now,” he said with Florida coastal waters behind him. “We can’t drill our way out of the problems we’re facing,” he said tapping the podium for emphasis.
Offshore drilling is not popular in many – if any – coastal states, particularly Florida, the presidential swing state that decided the 2000 election and where McCain is favored and Obama is looking to gain ground.
Both Obama and McCain are navigating the tricky political terrain around energy policy as rising gas prices infuriate voters who are largely focused on pocketbook issues in a shaky economy.
In announcing his support of lifting the moratorium, McCain said that with gas prices rising and the country chronically dependent on foreign oil, his proposal would “be very helpful in the short term resolving our energy crisis.”
“With gasoline running at more than four bucks a gallon, many do not have the luxury of waiting on the far-off plans of futurists and politicians. … And I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use,” McCain said in a speech this week.
His remarks were aimed at working-class voters, but his proposal no doubt won over big oil companies while infuriating environmentalists.
Obama, for his part, is using an argument similar to what he did during the Democratic primary season when rival Hillary Rodham Clinton followed McCain in calling for a summertime holiday from the federal gas tax.
Now as then, Obama says the proposals are nonsense because they won’t help consumers hurting now.
Earlier, in Chicago, Obama said McCain’s proposal “makes absolutely no sense at all.”
“Even then you’re looking at cents on a gallon of gas,” Obama told Democratic governors at a meeting in his hometown. “Who knows 22 years from now, what would gas be at the pace that we’re going right now?”
Instead, Obama said he would invest $150 billion over the next 10 years to create green jobs, particularly in the automotive industry and to improve the electricity grid so people can drive plug-in hybrid vehicles.
Obama discussed the economy with the 16 Democratic governors. They told him how people in their states are suffering, from high energy and food costs, loss of manufacturing jobs and the housing slump.
“There is a deep recession and frankly I believe it’s gaining momentum,” said New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, who backed Obama’s primary Clinton. “I don’t think we’re half way through.”
Obama said he would work with them on policies that would help, including a plan to spend billions in taxpayer dollars to build roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects that could create jobs and improve transportation routes. Obama asked if they have projects that were ready to go if they had the money, and there were nods and calls of “Absolutely!” around the table.
“Within three months, you could start putting people back to work,” he said.
West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin responded, “I think we could put a lot of people back to work in one month. We’re ready.”
11 comments
I don't want anyone to pander to oil or Wal Mart, both are horrible 'corporations.'
i say let it hurt, develop alternatives/progressive fuels(you capitalists hate that word 'progressive', don't you)and what oil, and the new oil off my beach, we have left over, transition and tax it with it...like Europe, (high taxes are negative re-enforcement) to using fossil fuels...
and when they pass the bill to drill off the coast, include a criminal act for the CEOs, CFO, COOs and the board, taking all their property, consider them a 'domestic enemy', and send them to GITMO!!! no arrainment hearing either...
Obama wants the tax and spend model that would destroy our way of life while adopting Socialism. I guess he believes that energy is not required to run a country like ours.
I suppose the Obama crowd think the increase from Saudi would be more acceptable than allow our drilling. Unfortunately, we would still have rely on unfriendly nations and our national security will remain compromised--- which is rather stupid.
The speculators have driven up the price of oil while the Obama crowd thinks they can control them. The sad truth is the speculators are off shore and out of reach from the Obama crowd.
Meanwhile politicians keep playing the stupid blame game while the media is doing nothing help the nation understand the issue and problems.
It is gross malfeasance of our Government to allow this present situation while having no clue as to what to do. There is absolutely no reason for Congress to go on vacation while we have this problem. They should be demanded to stay in session to address the energy problems this country faces.
Where is the outrage from the media to keep Congress in session-----------------?
Nuclear and oil are not 'worth while' for the planet or our health. There are no disposal methods for nuclear waste other than to bury them in places such as Yucca Mountain.
1. Nuclear energy could sustain its present minor contribution of some 21/2 percent of global final energy demand for about 75 years, but only by postponing indefinitely the expenditure of energy that would be needed to deal with its waste.
2. Each stage in the nuclear life-cycle, other than fission itself, produces carbon dioxide.
3. The depletion of uranium becomes apparent when nuclear power is considered as a major source of energy. For instance, if required to provide all the electricity used worldwide -- while clearing up the new waste it produced -- it could (notionally) do so for about six years before it ran out of usable rich uranium ore.
4. World uranium reserves are: Reasonable Assured Reserves recoverable at less than $US130/kgU (or $US50/lb U3O8) = 3.10 - 3.28 million tons.
Energy is required to run a country, but so is logical thinking and ingenuity. Nearly continuing the destruction of the planet with a nonrenewable, ever fleeting resource lacks both.
I do agree that we should be energy independent, as I believe all nations should. But depending on oil, spending billions of dollars on nuclear, oil, gas and coal technology to only further worsen the problem of global warming, all while waiting for minuscule results is preposterous.
I agree that Congress is at fault, but we cannot deny our failure to commit to fixing the problem either. Consuming less fuel while demanding alternatives that can be implemented is a logical way. It is not 'Socialism' as many would like to say, it is conservation and compassion.
Also, viable sources exist today and just need to be thoroughly funded as oil is. Solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, etc. are all viable and ready to be implemented in mass use.
It's the left wing environmentalist nut jobs that oppose it and the very radical barak Hussein Obama is pandering to them.
We need offshore drilling as well as alternatives. WE aren't going to run our cars by doing nothing as barak wants. Unless maybe he can enlist David Copperfield to concoct some magic potion?
Leave a comment
| « Hagel says he'd consider VP offer from Obama | McCain criticizes Obama's opposition to NAFTA » |